In Part 1, we briefly examined some Illuminati cards that are pieces of a game, but that appear to provide us with predictive programming and hints of truth. And now, we begin Part 2 of this article with two of those Illuminati cards:
The first card does not pull any punches. It specifically names NASA and depicts a faked mission to outer space, most likely a staged landing on the moon. The second card presents an astronaut in outer space reading a book. The name of this card is quite interesting. Usually when you think of science fiction, you think of Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. But the “Science Fiction Fans” card simply shows an astronaut. What does this suggest? Let's explore a possibility. There are many NASA fanboys and fangirls out there. They follow all the latest, thrilling developments at NASA. With its space missions and astronaut celebrities, NASA puts on a show to keep the dreamers in awe. But what if that’s all it is? A mere show. What if NASA is producing nothing more than science fiction (as the NASA Illuminati card seems to hint)? If this is what is happening, then NASA fanboys and fangirls are unknowingly just like comic book fans who cling to their favorite fictional characters and make-believe worlds. If the “Science Fiction Fans” Illuminati card was about science fiction fans the way we picture them, then the card should have portrayed a scene from a popular science fiction film or TV show, or perhaps featured an exciting, original alien creature. Instead, the card shows a simple astronaut in outer space. So who are the true science fiction fans? Are NASA fans getting sucked into science fiction when they entertain the idea of astronauts and outer space?
In Part 1, we saw examples of how Satan uses symbols and visual clues to mark the components of his world system (such as the medical establishment, America, etc.). Satan is proud (Isaiah 14:12-14), and he brags by marking his territory. Satan is referred to as a serpent in Genesis 3, Revelation 12:9, and Revelation 20:2. Is it any surprise that we find a serpent tongue in the NASA logo?
Why does the American public have faith in NASA? What made NASA a household name? The moon landing of 1969. Americans were glued to their televisions as they witnessed the unthinkable: Man landing and walking on the moon. It was on TV, so surely it was true. And the story has been told in the history books ever since. What a proud accomplishment. What a crowning achievement in American history. Or was it all a big hoax?
The “official” purpose of the Apollo missions was to place men on the moon.
As I stated in Part 1: “Apollo is just one of many false Greek gods, and this one is particularly sinister by being the god of light and truth, taking the place of God and/or Jesus.” Many people believe that America was founded to be a Christian nation. And yet, in the 1960s through the 1970s, the missions to land men on the moon were named after the Greek god Apollo. Why would a series of United States space missions be named after a Greek god? Were these missions marked with Greek mythology for the same reason that Washington D.C. was? Were these missions just another part of the Satanic world system?
So NASA has potential Satanic imagery in its logo, and NASA’s most famous missions were connected to Greek mythology. Big deal, right? What about real, damaging evidence against NASA? Is there any proof that NASA has faked one or more of its missions? There is much evidence, and I will offer a small portion of it. NASA is not the main subject of this article, but NASA serves a huge role in that subject. The “facts” we are told about the shape of the earth and the existence of outer space are “validated” by NASA, so we must decide if we trust NASA or not. I understand that there are many people who do not like to question things and would rather accept what they are told to be the “official” truth as the real truth. Nothing I or anyone else says will change the minds of the NASA fanboys and fangirls, or those who simply cannot entertain the idea that they’ve been lied to by their own government. If that’s you, just know that you are not my audience, and I don’t seek to change your mind. Do yourself a favor and go away. But for people who are willing to think and ask questions, let’s carry on. We have a Satanic world system in place, and we should not accept any “official” stories that come from that system. If you are a believer on Jesus Christ, then you are a believer on the truth. But why stop with spiritual truth? Why believe in spiritual truth but accept the lies of the tangible world around you? If Satan is the god of this world, then expect to find lies everywhere. Satan operates in secret and through lies. Is NASA a respectable organization, or does NASA constantly lie?
Before we begin to take NASA apart, let's consider the entertainment industry. Remember how Hollywood likes to show the public what is going to happen in the future (predictive programming)? Hollywood does this in order to make events more believable and easily digested when they finally occur (or get orchestrated). The public is more willing to accept radical ideas and changes if it has previously been introduced to such things through entertainment. When an event or change is presented to you that you might normally question, on a subconscious level you are more comfortable accepting this event or change because you have been programmed through the entertainment industry to accept it. There have been many movies about outer space and space travel. Let’s take a look at just a few, specifically what came before and leading up to NASA’s space missions.
Woman in the Moon (1929)
The following is from Wikipedia, and pay special attention to the last sentence, which I have presented in bold:
“Woman in the Moon (German Frau im Mond) is a science fiction silent film that premiered 15 October 1929. It is often considered to be one of the first ‘serious’ science fiction films. It was written and directed by Fritz Lang, based on the novel The Rocket to the Moon by his collaborator Thea von Harbou, his wife at the time. It was released in the USA as By Rocket to the Moon and in the UK as Woman in the Moon. The basics of rocket travel were presented to a mass audience for the first time by this film, including the use of a multi-stage rocket.” Across the world, the public was being groomed to believe in the idea of rocket travel through outer space.
Destination Moon (1950)
Project Moonbase (1953)
Plan 9 From Outer Space (1959)
2001: A Space Odyssey was released on April 2, 1968, fifteen months before the famous and first NASA “moon landing” took place. From a technical standpoint, 2001: A Space Odyssey was probably the most well-made film involving outer space at that time.
This screenshot resembles many of the Apollo 11 photographs that debuted the following year. It’s funny how even though no one had ever been on the moon, or even into outer space, movie studios already knew what it was going to look like way out there as far back as 1929. As I stated before, predictive programming was on display. The public was conditioned to believe in far-out places and fantastical ideas so they would more easily swallow it when the “real” things were presented to them. Images are powerful, and Hollywood blurs the line between fantasy and reality. Over time, as your mind processes images from film and television, you subconsciously begin to accept those images and storylines as parts of your own reality. What the public saw in 2001: A Space Odyssey prepared them for what they were going to be shown the following year, and in the years to come.
It’s time to take a look at the Apollo missions, but more specifically, the ones that supposedly placed men on the moon. I’m not going to spend a lot of time on this. What I will do is present you with some of the anomalies and problems that have been noted regarding the Apollo missions. There are many people who are better at this than me, and they have put together great collections of evidence proving man has never been on the moon. I would encourage you to take the time to research this topic further. I will touch on the basics. I won’t mention all of the theories and accusations, but rather the ones that I think are the best and more difficult to refute. And again, if you are a close-minded NASA fanboy or fangirl, there’s nothing for you to see here. Go play with your toy rockets. I don’t believe in NASA. But feel free to believe in fairy tales if you like.
Before we begin, let me state this up front: Though there are times when showing a video would be very helpful for my presentation, I will not ever link to videos. While I would like to link to some Youtube videos, it is not uncommon for Youtube videos or channels to be deleted, and then my article would be left with dead links. At times, I will show screenshots of Youtube videos, and while the videos themselves would be preferable, the screenshots cannot be lost as easily as the videos themselves.
THE APOLLO MISSIONS
Faking the distance
In the documentary A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, official NASA footage was revealed that had been filmed during the same time that Apollo 11 was supposedly on its way to the moon. In one clip, Neil Armstrong can be heard stating that he is 130,000 miles away from the earth. This would put the astronauts more than half-way to their destination, according to the official distance that we are told the moon is from the earth (238,900 miles). Let’s run through the details of this footage and look at a few screenshots, and I apologize for the fact that these images are not the best quality.
These two slides give the purpose and origin of the footage.
Here, two of the astronauts are visible.
Buzz Aldrin states that he and the other astronauts blocked out the sun from coming through the windows of the spacecraft. Why was this done? They were working to create an illusion for the American public. With the lights off and the sunlight blocked out, the walls of the spacecraft became black, and this blackness would ultimately be passed off to the public as outer space.
In this image, you can see that the earth is not a perfect circle. This is because the window was completely filled up with a view of earth (more on that shortly), and you are seeing a bright image coming through a window into a darkened area. The thickness of the window on the right and bottom distorts the image, preventing a perfect circle from being formed.
The shot was later improved upon, when an insert was placed into the shot to cover the right side of the earth, creating the deception that you are looking at the terminator line where the sunlight is not reaching the dark side of the earth.
Neil Armstrong claims that the camera lens has been pressed up against the window in order to take a video of earth from 130,000 miles out (in a segment meant to be played later for the American public). If the camera lens had indeed been placed against the window, then what happened in the image below?
How did something come between the window and the lens in this image?
Eventually, a light is visible in the upper left side of outer space (the darkened wall of the spacecraft).
Suddenly, the lights are turned on, and you can see that the camera is not up against the window, but rather further back in the spacecraft, behind an astronaut who moves around. The window is completely filled up with a view of the earth, meaning the astronauts were not in orbit, but rather at a high altitude, never 130,000 miles out.
Why would astronauts create a deceitful view of the earth from an exaggerated distance? Or maybe the question should be altered. If that was just a portion of the earth visible through that window, and it was filling up the entire window, then why create the illusion of outer space? If the astronauts were actually on their way to the moon, why wouldn’t they simply have taken a real video of the earth? The fact that this trickery occurred calls the entire Apollo 11 mission into question. There is no need to fake doing something that you can easily do. The only reason for fakery is if you cannot do what you are claiming to do. If you must fake going 130,000 miles out from the earth, that must mean you cannot go that far, and then obviously, that means you cannot go the 238,900 supposed miles to the moon. Again, the fact that the NASA astronauts were faking a video of the earth from that distance means that they could not actually take a video of the earth from that distance, because they could not actually go that distance.